| |
One irony of antibiotic use is that
while they are intended to "bolster" the immune respone by killing bacteria,
they may in some cases have a suppressive effect on immunty. Evidence for this
comes from two basic sources: studies of the effect of antibiotics on the
activity of white blood cells, and the outcome of infections treated with
antibiotics.
In an artivle published in The American Journal of Medicine in
1982, Drs. William Hauser and Jack Remington of Stanford University School of
Medicine reported on the ability of some antibiotics to alter the immune
response.Tetracycline was shown to inhibit the abilibty of white cells to engulf
and destroy bacteria (phagocytosis) and to delay the ability of white cells to
move to the site of infection. Sulfonamides inhibited the microbiocidal activity
of white cells. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole inhibited antibody production.
Similar action of numerous antibiotics was reported (26).
Antibiotics have
also been shown to increase the likelihood of repeat infections. In one report,
children with strep throat who were given antibiotics recovered from the initial
infection in short order. However, they experienced a rate of recurrent
infections two to eight time igher than those not recieving antibiotics. This
was especially true if antibiotics were given in the first two days of
illness.
Similar findings have been rported with antibiotics used to tret ear
infections. A study published in 1974 showed that children with actue earaches
who received antibiotics with in the first few days of illness experienced up to
2.9 percent recurrent infections than those in whom antibiotic use was delayed
(7 or more days) or avoided. (28). This study was met with some skepticism and
seemed to have little impact on medical practice. A 1991 article published in
the Journal of the American Medical Association has renewed the debate raised by
the 1974 study. It showed that children with chronic earaches who received
antibiotics experienced two to six times more recurrent middle ear effusion than
those receiving placebo. (29).
Such evidence seems to suggest that
antibiotics may in some cases limit the body's ability to recognize and destroy
invading bacteria. It appears that when antibiotic treatment is delayed,
children are able to develop natural immunity, thereby insulating them from
future episodes. Early antibiotic therapy may inhibit the initial immune
response, which may increase the likelihood of repeat infections.
|